Yglesias:
Nothing about losing an election forces you to bend to the will of the guy who won—just ask the Republicans who lost in 2006, then lost in 2008, then opposed everything Obama proposed, and are now thrilled to have 41 votes in the Senate. The option of responding to this setback with determination exists. There’s no rule preventing the House from passing the Senate health care bill. For that matter, there’s no rule preventing the reconciliation process from being used to implement a carbon tax with the revenue split between rebates, investments in clean energy, and deficit reduction. That’s not going to happen, but thereason it’s not going to happen is that Democratic members of congress don’t want to do it. They could go down in history as the people who took bold action to solve that problem, but they prefer not to.
This is so! And, unlike the realm of foreign policy, this is one of those areas where will actually matters. If they had the will, that is, Democrats could simply run roughshod over Republican opposition. They could shore up their own caucus and punish those members who refuse to play along. They could employ reconciliation. More drastically, they could alter the rules of the Senate and get rid of the filibuster.
But doing these things might earn them the Magical Frowns of David Broder, and so they don’t have the will to do them. David Broder will write mean things about them anyway, of course. People without adequate health insurance will continue to die needlessly, but the Democrats will have made an attempt to appease the unappeasable Village appetite for bashing them, and that, to them, will have been enough.
Yes, I’m in a foul mood.
—Jason